Atormac
Home  -  About us  -  Editorial board  -  Search  -  Ahead of print  -  Current issue  -  Archives  -  Instructions  -  Subscribe  -  Contacts  -  Advertise - Login 
 
 
     
ORIGINAL ARTICLE - EVALUATIVE STUDY
Year : 2015  |  Volume : 5  |  Issue : 1  |  Page : 37-43

A single center experience of craniofacial tissue expansion and reconstruction


Director and Consultant Maxillofacial Surgeon, Balaji Dental and Craniofacial Hospital, Teynampet, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India

Correspondence Address:
S M Balaji
Balaji Dental and Craniofacial Hospital, 30, KB Dasan Road, Teynampet, Chennai - 600 018, Tamil Nadu
India
Login to access the Email id


DOI: 10.4103/2231-0746.161057

PMID: 26389032

Rights and Permissions

Introduction: Tissue expansion is a versatile technique for craniofacial soft tissue defects. It has been extremely useful to restore the form and function along with good esthetics that were otherwise unobtainable. Objectives: To review the use of tissue expansion in the craniofacial region, with particular emphasis on indication, site, days, volume of the defect and tissue expansion used along with complications. Materials and Methods: Retrospective review of data on 18 expanded flap reconstructions performed in 14 patients during the period 2008-2013. Tissue expanders were placed on a subcutaneous plane above the fascia and inflated weekly. The expanded skin was used as a transposition flap for the reconstruction. Data were collected from archival records and tabulated in SPSS. Descriptive statistics, Kruskal-Wallis and Mann-Whitney tests were applied as required and a P ≤ 0.05 was taken as significant. Results: Trauma contributed to greater number of defects (57.1%). The most common defect occurs in face/cheek compartment (57.15%) followed by nose (35.71%). Owing to ease of access and better results, more expanders have been placed in cheek (50%), followed by neck (33.33%). The mean defect size was 2983.58 ± 828.27 mm 2 , required 32.14 ± 6.31 days, 335.6 ± 156.51 ml in 5.29 ± 1.5 cycles of tissue expansion. The mean rate of expansion was 59.17 ± 16.27, 69.11 ± 30.19 and 62.6 ± 25.75 for forehead, face/cheek and neck cases respectively (P = 0.873). Discussion: Laxity of skin appears to be a good indicator of the rate of the expansion. The most favorable site for tissue expansion is cheek followed by neck. The study also shows that tissue expansion is an efficient and valuable technique for reconstruction of large craniofacial skin defects.


[FULL TEXT] [PDF]*
Print this article     Email this article
 Next article
 Previous article
 Table of Contents

 Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
 Related articles
 Citation Manager
 Access Statistics
 Reader Comments
 Email Alert *
 Add to My List *
 * Requires registration (Free)
 

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed2825    
    Printed35    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded267    
    Comments [Add]    
    Cited by others 3    

Recommend this journal