Home  -  About us  -  Editorial board  -  Search  -  Ahead of print  -  Current issue  -  Archives  -  Instructions  -  Subscribe  -  Contacts  -  Advertise - Login 
 
 
     

 Table of Contents  
CASE REPORT
Year : 2016  |  Volume : 6  |  Issue : 2  |  Page : 292-296

Bullet removal from the infratemporal fossa


Department of Maxillo-Facial, Al-Karkh General Hospital, Baghdad, Iraq

Date of Web Publication17-Feb-2017

Correspondence Address:
Ahmed Maki Merza
Al-Karkh General Hospital, Baghdad
Iraq
Login to access the Email id


DOI: 10.4103/2231-0746.200340

PMID: 28299274

Rights and Permissions
  Abstract 

War injuries are the cornerstone of maxillofacial surgery, and it led to the initiation and development of this specialty, and each case represents a challenge to the surgeon who deals with it. In this article, we present a 30-year-old male patient who was referred to our emergency department complaining of gunshot wound, severe pain, and limitation in mouth opening. Preoperative imaging showed a bullet with a very long path lodged in the infratemporal fossa. Three different approaches with the aid of C-arm imaging system were used for the removal of this bullet; the last approach was the successful one.

Keywords: C-arm scanning, gunshot wounds, infratemporal fossa approach, missile injuries


How to cite this article:
Merza AM. Bullet removal from the infratemporal fossa. Ann Maxillofac Surg 2016;6:292-6

How to cite this URL:
Merza AM. Bullet removal from the infratemporal fossa. Ann Maxillofac Surg [serial online] 2016 [cited 2017 Jul 23];6:292-6. Available from: http://www.amsjournal.com/text.asp?2016/6/2/292/200340


  Introduction Top


”War is the only proper school for a surgeon” - Hippocrates. Lessons from the past should be documented and learned, and the experience should be passed among surgeons who deal with war injuries.

Since 2003 and till now, there had been a huge number of missile injuries in Iraq due to the war against terrorism and that put us the surgeons to face all sorts of these injuries, which categorized in the literature as nonpenetrating, penetrating, perforating, or avulsive. Avulsive injuries have entrance and exit wounds, generally presenting with an acute loss of tissue associated with passage of the projectile out of the victim. Nonpenetrating injuries are grazing or blast wound. Penetrating wounds are caused by the projectile striking the victim but not exiting the body. Perforating injuries have entrance and exit wounds, classically described as being without appreciable tissue loss.[1],[2] The removal of foreign bodies in penetrating type of missile injuries is usually recommended because they can move to a deeper position, and their presence may result in unexpected complications, especially when the foreign body is located in dangerous area such as infratemporal fossa, and a real risk is always exists to the neighboring nerves or vessels during the removal procedure. Preoperative routine radiographs and computed tomography (CT) scans in the head and neck region yield limited information of the foreign body location to extract it. Hence, to remove it, an intraoperative portable imaging system (C-arm) is needed.[3],[4]

This case discusses the problem related to head and neck missile injuries, their irregular path, diagnostic and therapeutic consequences, and the special approaches to the infratemporal fossa.


  Case Report Top


This case concerns a retained bullet in the right side infratemporal fossa. Entry of the bullet was from the left side shoulder region making a small lacerated inverted inlet, crossing the left shoulder, passing obliquely through the pharynx, and in front of the spine then finally lodging in the right infratemporal fossa. The patient came walking to the emergency department and was fully conscious with a Glasgow Coma Scale (15); no active bleeding or expanding hematoma was noticed, but the patient complained of severe pain in the right side maxillary vestibule and tenderness over the right side zygomatic arch with limitation in the mouth opening (<20 mm).

The primary, secondary, and tertiary survey was done, and the patient observed during first 24 h; two plain radiographs at right angle to each other were taken for initial assessment as shown in [Figure 1] and [Figure 2], and then, a computerized tomography scan was also done to show the location of the bullet which was lodged in the infratemporal fossa between the lateral pterygoid muscle and lower part of temporalis muscle below the level of the zygomatic arch and medially to it and that was causing the limitation in mouth opening; a very interesting finding was discovered that in spite of this long dangerous course, the bullet did not cause any injury to the major vessels, nerves, or hard tissue structures [Figure 3].
Figure 1: Posterior-anterior radiograph

Click here to view
Figure 2: Open and closed mouth lateral radiograph

Click here to view
Figure 3: Computerized tomography

Click here to view


After the 24 h, a small swelling with tenderness on palpation was noticed in the left side suprascapular area of the neck near the site of the inlet which increased in size to extend from the inferior border of the mandible to the clavicle with fever, severe tenderness, and increased white blood count (>25 × 109); Doppler and angiography were done to check vascular tree of the neck before abscess drainage and they were negative, during that the patient begin to develop the signs of septic shock, so immediately, the patient was transferred to the operation theater, and under general anesthesia, a vertical incision about 5 cm in length at the region of anterior border of the sternocleidomastoid muscle was done; large amount of serosanguinous purulent discharge was evacuated from the neck, and two vacuum drains were inserted from remote area to the incision site; after 3 days, the swelling was subside, but the bullet was still inside.

Bullet removal was done in a second session under general anesthesia with the usage of a mobile image intensifier which generally consists of two units, the X-ray generator and image system on a portable imaging system (C-arm) and the workstation unit used to store and manipulate the images. In this session, three approaches to the infratemporal fossa to extract the bullet were used, first: intraoral maxillary vestibular approach; second: lateral one-third of the eyebrow, but unfortunately, they were unhelpful to extract the bullet, so third: preauricular approach with temporal extension (question mark incision) was ultimately used by making full fasciocutaneous flap then reflection of the temporalis muscle from the temporal bone to finally reach the infratemporal fossa and extracting the bullet with the benefit of the portable imaging system (C-arm).

Postoperative condition was very good, shows gradual increase in mouth opening, and without any neural deficit in facial nerve.


  Discussion Top


In missile injuries, the type of injury whether it is nonpenetrating, penetrating, perforating, or avulsive; suspected path and type of the object should be considered in each case individually cause all these factors will complicate injuries which are usually diagnostically and therapeutically challenging [5] [Figure 4], [Figure 5], [Figure 6]. This case shows a penetrating missile injuries with a bullet (projectile) lodged in the right side infratemporal fossa and an inlet in the left side shoulder with an amazing long path crossing the three zones of the neck without causing any neural or vascular deficit which is may be attributed to the ability of low-velocity bullet to push away or stretched soft tissues including vessels or nerves [5] [Figure 7]. Furthermore, complete examination should be done, and appropriate imaging is necessary to define the magnitude and nature of head and neck injuries; CT scan with three-dimensional reformatting is essential for obtaining this information.
Figure 4: Missile injury, perforating type

Click here to view
Figure 5: Missile injury, avulsive type

Click here to view
Figure 6: Missile injury, penetrating type

Click here to view
Figure 7: The path of the bullet

Click here to view


Hard signs of vascular injuries, such as expanding hematoma, need urgent evaluation and intervention, so Doppler ultrasound and helical computed tomographic angiography were done to exclude any vascular injury after that neck exploration expelled a serosanguinous purulent discharge, and this is may be attributed to soft-tissue necrosis and small vessel damage resulted from the pressure wave, temporary, and permanent cavitation effects of the bullet; also, it may is be attributed to the microthrombus formation, vascular endothelial loss, and necrosis as far as 3 cm from the wound margins.[6],[7]

Although many approaches to the infratemporal fossa described in literatures, preauricular incision with temporal extension and temporalis muscle reflection from the temporal bone is the successful approach which was used to extract the bullet from the infratemporal fossa in this case, while the other two conservative approaches (intraoral and lateral eyebrow) which also had been used first in this case were unsuccessful [Figure 8], [Figure 9], [Figure 10].
Figure 8: The approacheswith

Click here to view
Figure 9: Marking preauricular with temporal extension approach

Click here to view
Figure 10: Temporalis muscle reflection to expose temporal and infratemporal fossa, also the lateral eyebrow approach can be seen

Click here to view


Blind vigorous dissection around the area of bullet without imaging intraoperatively might cause foreign body to migrate to a deeper anatomical site, cause severe bleeding from major blood vessels such as maxillary artery, and/or neural damage to branches of the trigeminal nerve that founded in the infratemporal fossa. Thus, the procedure done in conjunction with using portable imaging system (C-arm) which was very helpful in accurately localize foreign body in surgical field as shown in [Figure 11] and [Figure 12].[7],[8] Follow-up showed improvement in mouth opening without any weakness in facial nerve [Figure 13].
Figure 11: Bullet localization intraoperatively by portable imaging system (C-arm)

Click here to view
Figure 12: Bullet removal

Click here to view
Figure 13: Wound closure and drain insertion

Click here to view



  Conclusion Top


We recommend early debridement with copious irrigation of the inlet and the accessible path of the bullet. Also to approach the infratemporal fossa through preauricular incision with temporal extension and using C-arm imaging system for exact localization of lost foreign bodies in the oral and maxillofacial area as a safe and readily available procedure, especially in cases, in which the object is embedded in soft tissue.

The postoperative physiotherapy is very useful in increasing the range of mouth opening.

Acknowledgment

I would like to express my special thanks to the Emeritus professor Dr. Raja Kummoona for his mentorship and guidance.

Financial support and sponsorship

Nil.

Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts of interest.

 
  References Top

1.
Rowley DI. The management of war wounds involving bone. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1996;78:706-9.  Back to cited text no. 1
    
2.
Gugala Z, Lindsey RW. Classification of gunshot injuries in civilians. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2003;(408):65-81.  Back to cited text no. 2
    
3.
Park SS, Yang HJ, Lee UL, Kwon MS, Kim MJ, Lee JH, et al. The clinical application of the dental mini C-arm for the removal of broken instruments in soft and hard tissue in the oral and maxillofacial area. J Craniomaxillofac Surg 2012;40:572-8.  Back to cited text no. 3
    
4.
Siessegger M, Mischkowski RA, Schneider BT, Krug B, Klesper B, Zöller JE. Image guided surgical navigation for removal of foreign bodies in the head and neck. J Craniomaxillofac Surg 2001;29:321-5.  Back to cited text no. 4
    
5.
Cunningham LL, Haug RH, Ford J. Firearm injuries to the maxillofacial region: An overview of current thoughts regarding demographics, pathophysiology, and management. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2003;61:932-42.  Back to cited text no. 5
    
6.
Szul AC, Davis LB, Walter Reed Army Medical Center Borden Institute. Emergency War Surgery. Revision 3. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office; 2004.  Back to cited text no. 6
    
7.
Tan YH, Zhou SX, Liu YQ, Liu BL, Li ZY. Small-vessel pathology and anastomosis following maxillofacial firearm wounds: An experimental study. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1991;49:348-52.  Back to cited text no. 7
    
8.
Smith JE, Ducic Y, Adelson R. The utility of the temporalis muscle flap for oropharyngeal, base of tongue, and nasopharyngeal reconstruction. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2005;132:373-80.  Back to cited text no. 8
    


    Figures

  [Figure 1], [Figure 2], [Figure 3], [Figure 4], [Figure 5], [Figure 6], [Figure 7], [Figure 8], [Figure 9], [Figure 10], [Figure 11], [Figure 12], [Figure 13]



 

Top
 
 
Search
Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
 Related articles
Access Statistics
Email Alert *
Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)  

 
  In this article
   Abstract
  Introduction
  Case Report
  Discussion
  Conclusion
   References
   Article Figures

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed548    
    Printed2    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded59    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal