Atormac
Home  -  About us  -  Editorial board  -  Search  -  Ahead of print  -  Current issue  -  Archives  -  Instructions  -  Subscribe  -  Contacts  -  Advertise - Login 
 
 
     

 Table of Contents  
CASE REPORT - TUMORS AND TUMOR LIKE CONDITIONS
Year : 2019  |  Volume : 9  |  Issue : 2  |  Page : 451-454

Priority of treatment in craniofacial fibrous dysplasia


1 Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Malla Reddy Dental College for Women and Hospital, Hyderabad, Telangana, India
2 Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Government Dental College and Hospital, Hyderabad, Telangana, India
3 Department of Periodontics, Sri Sai College of Dental Surgery, Vikarabad, Telangana, India
4 Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Maharaja Institute of Medical Sciences, Vizianagaram, Andhra Pradesh, India

Date of Web Publication11-Dec-2019

Correspondence Address:
Chembolu Neelima
Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Malla Reddy Dental College for Women and Hospital, Hyderabad, Telangana
India
Login to access the Email id


DOI: 10.4103/ams.ams_186_17

Rights and Permissions
  Abstract 


Fibrous dysplasia (FD) is a nonneoplastic hamartomatous developmental fibro-osseous lesion, with anomaly in bone-forming mesenchyme which manifests as a defect in osteoblastic differentiation and maturation leading to fibro-osseous tissue formation characterized by deformities in the bone, fractures, nerve compression, and bone pain. The clinical behavior and progression of FD make the management of this condition difficult. Here is a case report of a young male patient who was diagnosed as having craniomaxillofacial FD. The diagnosis was based on clinicoradiological and histopathological investigations. In this case, management of FD poses significant challenges to the surgeon.

Keywords: Bones, cranium, fibrous dysplasia, polyostotic


How to cite this article:
Neelima C, Reddy PB, Nirupama C, Kumar EV. Priority of treatment in craniofacial fibrous dysplasia. Ann Maxillofac Surg 2019;9:451-4

How to cite this URL:
Neelima C, Reddy PB, Nirupama C, Kumar EV. Priority of treatment in craniofacial fibrous dysplasia. Ann Maxillofac Surg [serial online] 2019 [cited 2020 Jan 18];9:451-4. Available from: http://www.amsjournal.com/text.asp?2019/9/2/451/272587




  Introduction Top


Fibrous dysplasia (FD) of bones was first described by Von Recklinghausen in 1891. Lichtenstein coined the term FD of bone in 1938.[1],[2] Many syndromes affect the craniofacial region. One of them which drastically affect the face causing gross deformity is craniofacial FD. Craniofacial FD is described as lesions which are confined to bones of craniofacial skeleton. They are not truly polyostotic as bones other than craniofacial are spared. There are very few cases reported in the literature, seen most often in the first three decades of life.[3] It is caused by somatic-activating mutations encoded by the gene GNAS in the α subunit of the stimulating G protein.[3],[4],[5],[6] It has the potential to cause cosmetic and functional disturbance. Ocular effects are of particular concern. Its compression of the optic nerve resulting in visual impairment is alarming.[7] Below is a case of a 10-year-old male patient of craniofacial polyostotic FD and approach toward treatment.


  Case Report Top


A 10-year-old male patient came to the Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery with the complaint of displacement of right eye inferiorly, swelling over the right forehead region as seen in [Figure 1] and [Figure 2]. The swelling has begun 8 months ago and has noticeably increased in size within this period. There was no history of trauma or any infection to this area. No history of headache, pain over the swelling, and fever. Normal vision was noted. On examination, the patient has 6 cm × 7 cm size bony prominence on the right frontal area as seen in [Figure 3]. Swelling is not tender and immobile and hard in consistency. No overlying skin changes. No inflammatory changes seen over the swelling. No abnormality seen in his ears, nose, and mouth. The left eye was proptosed and displaced inferolaterally. Pupillary responses were normal in both the eyes. No change in the voice quality. Mouth opening was normal. No lymphadenopathy seen. No thyroid changes noted. No past medical history. Complete blood picture, parathyroid hormone, calcium–phosphorus levels, and serum alkaline phosphatase are within normal limits.
Figure 1: Frontal view: Inferior displacement of the right eye

Click here to view
Figure 2: Raise of the left eye superiorly, swelling over the left maxilla

Click here to view
Figure 3: Lateral view: Frontal bossing and proptosis of the eye

Click here to view


Computed tomography (CT) scan reveals asymmetrical increase in bone density with diffuse asymmetrical widening of diploe spaces with thick ground-glass attenuation of matrix is seen involving the right frontal bone, right temporal bone, parietal bone, occipital and sphenoid bones, left maxilla, left zygoma, body and ramus on left and right side of mandible [Figure 4], ethmoid bones, clivus, occipital condyles noted causing asymmetry, and deformation of facial bones. Narrowed sella was seen. Complete sclerosis of mastoid air cells on the right side was seen. Relative narrowing of foramina of skull was noted as seen in [Figure 5] and [Figure 6].
Figure 4: Increase in bone density in the jaw bones

Click here to view
Figure 5: Transverse section of CT scan skuil

Click here to view
Figure 6: Computed tomography scan shows deformation of the cranial and facial bones

Click here to view


Incisional biopsy was performed in the mandible providing diagnosis of craniofacial polyostotic FD. Histological examination showed connective tissue cell stroma consisting of fibroblasts seen in whorled pattern. Ribbon-like osteoid trabeculae lined by numerous osteoblasts changing into woven bone along with osteoclasts. Multinucleated giant cells noted with areas of hemorrhage in areas of cystic changes.

We have aggressively screened for endocrinopathies, i.e., growth hormone excess. Lesion is not showing rapid growth, no new onset of pain or paresthesia, and visual or hearing changes which warrant immediate surgical referral. In some, cases history, clinical examination, and radiographic diagnosis are adequate for diagnosis of the lesion. Such cases are postponed for surgical treatment until after skeletal maturity and when lesion is quiescent. Rapid change in lesion or any threatening symptoms occur; surgical resection or contouring is warranted. Bisphosphonates are not given as the patient does not complain of pain. This disease requires multidisciplinary execution for optimal care.

Hence, the patient was referred to ophthalmologist for opinion, as the optic nerve compression noted in the CT scan. At present, the patient has no visual impairment. The patient is kept under observation for the symptoms to appear. Each patient presents with variable clinical findings and symptoms. Care of these patients should be customized for the site of lesion and their needs. So in this case, treatment is planned on priority needs. Therapeutic decompression of optic canal was planned when symptoms appear.


  Discussion Top


FD is a nonneoplastic condition where normal bone is replaced by fibrous tissue and haphazardly distributed woven bone. FD is caused by mutations in the α subunit of the stimulatory G protein encoded by the gene GNAS.[4],[5] It may involve one bone monostotic or multiple bones polyostotic. McCune–Albright syndrome is a triad of polyostotic FD, café-au-lait skin macules, and endocrinopathies with precocious puberty.[5],[8] In polyostotic FD, 90% of cases involve craniofacial region and 95% cases involve the anterior cranial base. FD is a slow-growing mass lesion. The lesions show rapid growth with the cortical bone expansion with displacement of adjacent structures such as the eye and the teeth in young children and prepubertal adolescents. The symptoms include facial asymmetry, visual changes, nasal congestion, pain, paresthesia, hearing impairment, and malocclusion.[3],[5],[9],[10] Malignant change to osteosarcoma has been reported. Functional deficits result due to invasion or compression of vital structures such as the optic nerve, globe and auditory canal, and nasal airway. Neurosurgeons, oral and maxillofacial surgeons, otolaryngologists, and ophthalmologists are consulted based on the symptoms and site of involvement.[9]

The most often found radiological examination shows ground-glass appearance with thin cortical bone and no distinct borders. Its appearance can vary from ground glass to homogenous or mixed radiolucent or radiopaque depending on age of the patient.[3],[7],[11],[12]

The radiographic appearance of FD has three basic patterns:

  • Type 1: Small unilocular or multilocular radiolucency well-circumscribed border with network of fine trabeculae
  • Type 2: More opaque and mottled lesion
  • Type 3: Opaque with delicate trabeculae showing ground-glass appearance or Peau d'orange.[4],[13]


CT imaging provides the site of involvement and extensions of the disease in the face and skull bones. Plain films cause overlapping of adjacent structures leading to less diagnostic value in cranial and facial lesions. Lesions around the dentition can be examined and managed by dental radiographs.[11]

Most frequent findings with polyostotic FD around the eye are dystopia hypertelorism due to the involvement of frontal, sphenoid and ethmoid bones, and proptosis. Other findings are difficulty in lid closure, strabismus, optic neuropathy, nasolacrimal duct obstruction, tearing, and trigeminal neuralgia due to skull base involvement.[7],[11],[14]

In the above case, there was involvement of FD in the cranial and skull base bones and also involving optic nerve, but vision was normal. Our highest concern was for any future vision loss. Regular observation with ophthalmologic examinations in this patient with asymptomatic encasement was treatment option, and optic nerve decompression was not warranted. Studies show that prophylactic decompression may have no improvement in vision or worse postoperative blindness.[5],[15],[16] Neuroopthalmologic examination for assessment of optic neuropathy includes visual acuity, field examination, color vision, dilated fundus examination, and contrast sensitivity. Others include papillary examination such as afferent pupil, proptosis measurement, exophthalmometry, extraocular movements, lid closure, hypertelorism, tear duct, and puncta examination. Any vision changes the patient has to be referred to neuroopthalmologist.

Various treatment modalities based on site, extent of involvement, and priority of symptoms, there are various categories. Wait and watch technique followed in small asymptomatic lesions which can be kept under observation. Medical therapy includes the use of high-dose glucocorticoids in a new expansile lesions near the optic nerve which could be a aneurysmal bone cyst, which cause immediate decompression and later indicated for resection.[3],[9],[17]

The use of bisphosphonates such as alendronate, pamidronate, or zoledronic acid is considered as nonsurgical and adjuvant therapy to reduce the pain and rate of growth of the lesion.[3],[7],[11],[17]

Serum alkaline phosphatase and urinary hydroxyproline are useful markers for monitoring the response of nonsurgical therapy and not for diagnosis. Some studies have shown their role in detecting the recurrence of the disease.[3],[7],[17],[18]

Surgical recontouring or remodeling is a conservative method to achieve acceptable esthetics. Stabilization of the lesion occurs when maturation of the bone completes. However, long-term follow-up is important.[17] Surgery is preferred when there is a threat to optic nerve, causing damage to vision. Most surgeons prefer radical surgical therapy with immediate reconstruction to avoid functional disturbances and restore facial form and esthetics.[9] Iliac, rib, and calvarial grafts or revascularized free flaps are used. Some prefer removing thin bone followed by remodeling and reimplant with dysplastic bone grafts for surgical defects. Patients older than 17 years of age where complete resection is not possible, partial resection of the lesion can be considered as regrowth of the lesion is less and importance is given more for aesthesis.

Chen and Noordhoff in 1990 proposed a treatment algorithm for the management of craniomaxillofacial FD. The head and face are divided into four zones based on the unique anatomic considerations for operating in each area and esthetic and functional considerations of the disease at these sites.

  • Zone 1: Represents the fronto-orbito-malar regions of the face. They recommend radical excision and reconstruction with simple bone grafting techniques, as they are esthetically critical
  • Zone 2: Represents the hair-bearing scalp. Intervention is optional for the patient
  • Zone 3: Represents the central skull base; the sphenoid, pterygoid, petrous temporal bone, and mastoid. Recommends observation of lesions, as there is difficulty in obtaining surgical access to these areas
  • Zone 4: Comprises the maxilla and mandible and tooth-bearing portions of the skull. Recommends conservative management as there is difficulty in reconstructing defects.[3],[7],[17],[19]



  Conclusion Top


Most disaster in craniofacial FD is it occurs in the first few decades of life leading to psychological trauma. Growth of the lesion occurs till bone maturation is complete. Early diagnosis and appropriate treatment will increase the period of existence. Long-term follow-up plays a key role. Even with varied treatment options, no procedure is completely successful. Treatment has to be individualized for every patient based on site, extent, and symptoms of the disease. Knowledge regarding the disease is vital for diagnosis, treatment, and follow-up.

Declaration of patient consent

The authors certify that they have obtained all appropriate patient consent forms. In the form the patient(s) has/have given his/her/their consent for his/her/their images and other clinical information to be reported in the journal. The patients understand that their names and initials will not be published and due efforts will be made to conceal their identity, but anonymity cannot be guaranteed.

Financial support and sponsorship

Nil.

Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts of interest.



 
  References Top

1.
Sumita M, Mala K, Karen B. Maxillofacial fibrous dysplasia. Indian J Dent Res 2005;16:151-2.  Back to cited text no. 1
    
2.
Amol J, Saurav M, Krutik P, Shaikh A, Shopnil P. Fibrous dysplasia: A case series of five cases. Int J Adv Med 2016;3:1068-73.  Back to cited text no. 2
    
3.
Deepthi A, Jayanth BS, Begum F, Shreyas O, Rao A. Fibrous dysplasia of the craniofacial region – A brief understanding of the disease. J Adv Clin Res Insights 2016;3:205-8.  Back to cited text no. 3
    
4.
Bhavana SM, Nagalaxmi V, Maloth KN, Lakshmi CR, Deshpande PS. Craniofacial fibrous dysplasia – A morbid presentation. J Pak Med Assoc 2014;64:351-4.  Back to cited text no. 4
    
5.
Guru KN, Borle R, Guru RK. An unusual presentation of craniofacial fibrous dysplasia: A case report, review and update on management. Am J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2015;2:15-22.  Back to cited text no. 5
    
6.
Sepúlveda I, Spencer ML, Flores P, Ulloa J. Craniofacial fibrous dysplasia: A case report and literature review. Case Rep Clin Pathol 2016;4:47.  Back to cited text no. 6
    
7.
Chen YR, Chang CN, Tan YC. Craniofacial fibrous dysplasia: An update. Chang Gung Med J 2006;29:543-9.  Back to cited text no. 7
    
8.
Sandhu SV, Sandhu JS, Sabharwal A. Clinicoradiologic perspective of a severe case of polyostotic fibrous dysplasia. J Oral Maxillofac Pathol 2012;16:301-5.  Back to cited text no. 8
  [Full text]  
9.
Guruprasad Y, Prabhakar C. Craniofacial polyostotic fibrous dysplasia. Contemp Clin Dent 2010;1:177-9.  Back to cited text no. 9
[PUBMED]  [Full text]  
10.
Cdr AA, Capt BC. Craniofacial fibrous dysplasia presenting with visual impairment. Med J Armed Forces India 2003;59:342-3.  Back to cited text no. 10
    
11.
Lee JS, FitzGibbon EJ, Chen YR, Kim HJ, Lustig LR, Akintoye SO, et al. Clinical guidelines for the management of craniofacial fibrous dysplasia. Orphanet J Rare Dis 2012;7 Suppl 1:S2.  Back to cited text no. 11
    
12.
Bijai LK, Mathew P, Jayaraman V, Austin RD. Fibrous Dysplasia – A case report and review of literature. Int J Dent Sci Res 2014;2:109-11.  Back to cited text no. 12
    
13.
Mahadesh J, Gowda C, Devi L, Kokila G. Fibrous dysplasia of the jaw bones: Clinical, radiographical and histopathological features. Report of two cases. J Dent Sci Res 2011;2:18-25.  Back to cited text no. 13
    
14.
Liakos GM, Walker CB, Carruth JA. Ocular complications in craniofacial fibrous dysplasia. Br J Ophthalmol 1979;63:611-6.  Back to cited text no. 14
    
15.
Clark J, Carson W. A case of craniofacial polyostotic fibrous dysplasia. J Radiol Case Rep 2010;4:1-6.  Back to cited text no. 15
    
16.
Amit M, Collins MT, FitzGibbon EJ, Butman JA, Fliss DM, Gil Z. Surgery versus watchful waiting in patients with craniofacial fibrous dysplasia – A meta-analysis. PLoS One 2011;6:e25179.  Back to cited text no. 16
    
17.
Menon S, Venkatswamy S, Ramu V, Banu K, Ehtaih S, Kashyap VM. Craniofacial fibrous dysplasia: Surgery and literature review. Ann Maxillofac Surg 2013;3:66-71.  Back to cited text no. 17
[PUBMED]  [Full text]  
18.
Fan Y, Liu J, Zhang C, Zhang Z, Yang H, Hu J. Maxillofacial fibrous dysplasia: A clinical analysis of 72 cases. Biomed Res 2017;28:2498-2503.  Back to cited text no. 18
    
19.
Rahman AM, Madge SN, Billing K, Anderson PJ, Leibovitch I, Selva D, et al. Craniofacial fibrous dysplasia: Clinical characteristics and long-term outcomes. Eye (Lond) 2009;23:2175-81.  Back to cited text no. 19
    


    Figures

  [Figure 1], [Figure 2], [Figure 3], [Figure 4], [Figure 5], [Figure 6]



 

Top
 
 
Search
Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
 Related articles
Access Statistics
Email Alert *
Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)  

 
  In this article
   Abstract
  Introduction
  Case Report
  Discussion
  Conclusion
   References
   Article Figures

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed136    
    Printed2    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded28    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal