|ORIGINAL ARTICLE - RETROSPECTIVE STUDY
|Year : 2020 | Volume
| Issue : 1 | Page : 133-135
Donor site morbidity in submental flap: Emphasizing on facial hairs direction
Amin Rahpeyma1, Saeedeh Khajehahmadi2
1 Oral and Maxillofacial Diseases Research Center; Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, School of Dentistry, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran
2 Dental Research Center; Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Pathology, School of Dentistry, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran
|Date of Submission||17-Sep-2019|
|Date of Acceptance||01-Dec-2019|
|Date of Web Publication||8-Jun-2020|
Dr. Saeedeh Khajehahmadi
Dental Research Center, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Vakilabad Blvd, Mashhad
Introduction: Donor site morbidity is an important factor for selecting a flap for reconstruction. Submental flap using submentum skin for reconstruction has low donor site morbidity. Up to now, donor site morbidity of submental flap in Caucasians has not been evaluated. Materials and Methods: In a retrospective study, donor site morbidity of the submental flap including changes in hair direction, hypertrophic scars, and suture marks was evaluated. Results: Forty patients with at least 2 years of follow-up were evaluated. Female patients indicated better esthetic results. Abrupt beard hair direction change occurred in five male patients. Two hypertrophic scars and one suture mark were recorded. Conclusion: The direction of beard hairs in submentum may be changed after submental flap harvest. Accordingly, this is important in some ethnic and religious groups.
Keywords: Beard hairs, donor site morbidity, submental flap
|How to cite this article:|
Rahpeyma A, Khajehahmadi S. Donor site morbidity in submental flap: Emphasizing on facial hairs direction. Ann Maxillofac Surg 2020;10:133-5
| Introduction|| |
Donor site morbidity is an important factor for selecting a flap for reconstruction. Submental flap uses submentum skin for reconstruction and has low donor site morbidity. This flap has a large paddle area, reliable, and in proximity to oral cavity. Flap harvest is easy and oncological safe in necks without metastasis. Some beneficial esthetic effects are also mentioned in the articles, to improve the cervical angle and eliminate the ptotic chin., Morbidity of donor site for this flap has been earlier evaluated in an article with significant results. Five evaluated parameters were smiling, whistling, neck extension, beard hair changes, and esthetic outcomes.
This investigation was done on Taiwanese population with less hairs in their upper neck and submentum, while Caucasian males had high-density thick beard hairs.
| Materials and Methods|| |
Those patients for whom myocutaneous submental flap was used for oral cavity reconstruction were included in a retrospective study. All the patients were operated in the Oral and Maxillofacial Department of a university hospital (2005–2017) for oral cavity reconstruction. Minimum follow-up duration was 2 years. Donor site morbidity including change in hair direction, hypertrophic scar, and suture marks was evaluated.
| Results|| |
Fifty-two patients had been managed by submental flap, among them 40 patients responded to recall. Twenty-two patients were male and 18 of them were female. Age range was between 8 and 82 years.
Female patients were more satisfied, but variable results were recorded in male patients; some with good esthetic results and the others with more noticeable changes. Patients with low-density hairs in the submentum and upper neck had better esthetic outcomes along with the patients with high-density hairs in these two regions. The worst results were obtained in five patients with high-density hairs in the submental region and low-density hairs in their upper neck region [Figure 1]. Hypertrophic scar was observed in two patients; an 8-year-old girl and a 16-year-old boy [Figure 2]. Suture marks were present in one female patient. The sutures were removed with delay, due to the fear of wound opening up expressed by the patient [Figure 3].
|Figure 1: (a) Linear submental scar in a female patient, (b) submental donor site in a patient with low-density beard hairs, (c) submental donor site in a patient with high-density beard and low density hairs in upper neck. Demarcation line is 1 cm under the inferior mandibular border, (d) submental donor site in a patient with high-density hairs in upper neck and beard|
Click here to view
|Figure 2: Hypertrophic scar in a 16-year-old male patient with submental flap|
Click here to view
|Figure 3: Suture marks because of late suture removal, due to the patient fear from wound opening|
Click here to view
| Discussion|| |
Submental flap is known as a flap with low donor site morbidity. Based on the composition of the flap, it can be classified as fasciocutaneous, myocutaneous, or myoosseous. Myocutaneous variant with inclusion of anterior belly of digastric and mylohyoid muscle is the most prevalent form [Figure 4]. In male patients, donor site morbidity is more important due to their problem with growth of beard hair. Hair density in the submentum and upper neck determines the esthetic results. Abrupt hair direction changes occur in patients with high-density hairs in the submentum and low-density hairs in the upper neck. Transition zone between these two areas has been transferred with submental flap. After submental flap harvest, a distinct demarcation line remains in 1 cm under the inferior mandibular border, which is coincided with the upper limit of submental flap design. Before the surgery, patients with long beard hairs were forced toward clean shaven or light stubble after submental flap harvest.
|Figure 4: Donor site after harvest of myocutaneous submental flap with inclusion of digastric and mylohyoid muscles in the pedicle side and before the skin closure. The flap was transferred to oral cavity, so it is not visible in this figure|
Click here to view
Patient age is another important factor in donor site morbidity of submental flap. Children and teenagers had less skin laxity in the submentum. Exceeding the limitation of pinch test due to defect dimensions results in tension closure and consequently causes hypertrophic scar.
Suture marks are less important and can be avoided if correct surgical technique and strict adherence to the limitations of the flap width in the submental region are adhered.
| Conclusion|| |
The direction of beards hairs in the submentum may be changed after submental flap harvest. This is important in some ethnic and religious groups.
Declaration of patient consent
The authors certify that they have obtained all appropriate patient consent forms. In the form the patient(s) has/have given his/her/their consent for his/her/their images and other clinical information to be reported in the journal. The patients understand that their names and initials will not be published and due efforts will be made to conceal their identity, but anonymity cannot be guaranteed.
Financial support and sponsorship
Conflicts of interest
There are no conflicts of interest.
| References|| |
Squaquara R, Kim Evans KF, Spanio di Spilimbergo S, Mardini S. Intraoral reconstruction using local and regional flaps. Semin Plast Surg 2010;24:198-211.
Aslam-Pervez N, Caldroney SJ, Isaiah A, Lubek JE. A retrospective volume matched analysis of the submental artery island pedicled flap as compared to the forearm free flap: Is it a good alternative choice for the reconstruction of defects of the oral cavity and oropharynx? J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2018;76:656-63.
Rahpeyma A, Khajehahmadi S. Submental artery island flap in intraoral reconstruction: A review. J Craniomaxillofac Surg 2014;42:983-9.
Rahpeyma A, Khajehahmadi S. Needle subcision: A conservative treatment for facial dimpling after elimination of odontogenic infection source: A technical note. Oral Maxillofac Surg 2014;18:415-8.
Lee JC, Lai WS, Kao CH, Hsu CH, Chu YH, Lin YS. Multiple-parameter evaluation demonstrates low donor-site morbidity after submental flap harvesting. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2013;71:1800-8.
Bayon R, Davis AB. Submental flap for soft tissue reconstruction following radical parotidectomy. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2019;160:1130-2.
Rahpeyma A, Khajehahmadi S. A protocol for management of the hairs problem in oral cavity reconstruction by submental flap. J Maxillofac Oral Surg 2017;16:108-12.
Tsai WC, Yang JM, Liu SC, Chu YH, Lai WS, Lin YS, et al
. Management of different kinds of head and neck defects with the submental flap for reconstruction. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 2015;272:3815-9.
Khansa I, Harrison B, Janis JE. Evidence-based scar management: How to improve results with technique and technology. Plast Reconstr Surg 2016;138:165s-78s.
[Figure 1], [Figure 2], [Figure 3], [Figure 4]