Atormac
Home  -  About us  -  Editorial board  -  Search  -  Ahead of print  -  Current issue  -  Archives  -  Instructions  -  Subscribe  -  Contacts  -  Advertise - Login 
 
 
     

    Article Cited by others

COMPARATIVE STUDY

Efficacy of 4% articaine hydrochloride and 2% lignocaine hydrochloride in the extraction of maxillary premolars for orthodontic reasons

Hassan Shahid, Sripathi Rao B H, Sequeria Joyce, Rai Gunachander

Year : 2011| Volume: 1| Issue : 1 | Page no: 14-18

   This article has been cited by
 
1 Anesthetic Efficacy of Buccal Infiltration Articaine versus Lidocaine for Extraction of Primary Molar Teeth
Nilesh V. Rathi,Anushree A. Khatri,Akshat G. Agrawal,Sudhindra Baliga M,Nilima R. Thosar,Shravani G. Deolia
Anesthesia Progress. 2019; 66(1): 3
[Pubmed]  [Google Scholar] [DOI]
2 Efficacy of Infiltration Anaesthesia of 4% Articaine HCl (buccal) Versus 2% Lignocaine HCl (buccolingual) in Extraction of Mandibular Premolars: A Single Centred, Randomised, Crossover Group Study
Ajit Joshi,Harleen Kaur Soni
Journal of Maxillofacial and Oral Surgery. 2019;
[Pubmed]  [Google Scholar] [DOI]
3 Injectable local anaesthetic agents for dental anaesthesia
Geoffrey St George,Alyn Morgan,John Meechan,David R Moles,Ian Needleman,Yuan-Ling Ng,Aviva Petrie
Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. 2018;
[Pubmed]  [Google Scholar] [DOI]
4 Comparison of Ropivacaine 0.75% and Lignocaine 2% with 1:200,000 Adrenaline in Dental Extractions: Single Blind Clinical Trial
Vishal Bansal,Deval Kumar,Apoorva Mowar,Avi Bansal
Journal of Maxillofacial and Oral Surgery. 2016;
[Pubmed]  [Google Scholar] [DOI]

 

Read this article